eLibrary >
BSI Flex 1906 v1.0:2025-03 Future Flight Systems. Acceptable means of compliance to UK Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) for Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS). Guide >
Expand All
TOC Search:
BSI Flex 1906 v1.0:2025-03 Future Flight Systems. Acceptable means of compliance to UK Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) for Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS). Guide, 2025
- Contents
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms
- 3.1 Terms and definitions
- 3.2 Abbreviated terms
- 4 Method
- 4.1 General
- 4.2 Step 1: Identification of relevant requirements
- 4.3 Step 2: Assessment of cover required
- 4.4 Step 3: Review of Project Shepherd
- 4.5 Step 4: Review of EASA MoCs
- 4.6 Step 5: Gap analysis
- 4.7 Step 6: Further reading
- 5 Requirements
- 5.1 General
- 5.2 OSO 2 – UAS manufactured by competent and/or proven entity
- 5.3 OSO 3 – UAS maintained by competent and/or proven entity
- 5.4 OSO 8 – Operational procedures are defined, validated, and adhered to
- 5.5 OSO 16 – Multi crew coordination
- 5.6 Containment requirements
- 5.7 Containment requirements (tether)
- 5.8 M2 – Effects of UA impact dynamics are reduced (Technical Design)
- 5.9 M2 – Effects of UA impact dynamics are reduced (Procedures)
- 5.10 Functional Test-Based (FTB) Methods
- Bibliography
- Table 1 – SORA items included within BSI Flex 1906
- Table 2 – OSO 2 requirements coverage
- Table 3 – OSO 3 requirements coverage
- Table 4 – OSO 3 EASA/UK Comparison table
- Table 5 – OSO 8 requirements coverage
- Table 6 – OSO 8 EASA/UK Comparison table
- Table 7 – OSO 16 requirements coverage
- Table 8 – Containment requirements coverage
- Table 9 – Containment (tether) requirements coverage
- Table 10 – M2 (technical design) requirements coverage
- Table 11 – M2 (technical design) EASA/UK Comparison table
- Table 12 – M2 (procedures) requirements coverage
- Table 13 – M2 (procedures) EASA/UK Comparison table
- Table 14 – FTB requirements coverage [Go to Page]
