Already a subscriber? 
MADCAD.com Free Trial
Sign up for a 3 day free trial to explore the MADCAD.com interface, PLUS access the
2009 International Building Code to see how it all works.
If you like to setup a quick demo, let us know at support@madcad.com
or +1 800.798.9296 and we will be happy to schedule a webinar for you.
Security check
Please login to your personal account to use this feature.
Please login to your authorized staff account to use this feature.
Are you sure you want to empty the cart?
PD IEC TR 61390:2022 Ultrasonics. Real-time pulse-echo systems. Test procedures to determine performance specifications, 2022
- undefined
- CONTENTS
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms and definitions
- Figures [Go to Page]
- Figure 1 – Beam geometry
- 4 Environmental conditions
- 5 Recommended equipment
- 6 Test methods [Go to Page]
- 6.1 Instruments [Go to Page]
- 6.1.1 General
- 6.1.2 Hydrophones
- 6.1.3 Oscilloscope or other transient recorder
- 6.1.4 Spectrum analyzer
- 6.1.5 Pulse generator
- 6.1.6 Tissue-mimicking test objects
- 6.1.7 Tank and degassed water
- 6.1.8 High or low reflective target
- 6.1.9 Target holder and/or positioning system
- 6.1.10 Computing system to run computer-assisted evaluation software
- 6.1.11 Software to evaluate quality parameters
- 6.2 Test settings [Go to Page]
- 6.2.1 General
- 6.2.2 Display settings (focus, brilliance, contrast)
- 6.2.3 Sensitivity settings (frequency, suppression, output power, overall gain, TGC, automatic TGC)
- 6.2.4 Final optimisation
- 6.2.5 Recording system
- 6.3 Tested quantities / parameters and procedures [Go to Page]
- 6.3.1 General
- 6.3.2 Acoustic working-frequency bandwidth
- 6.3.3 Resolution
- 6.3.4 Contrast-detail resolution
- 6.3.5 Non- or minimally-scattering region detectability
- Figure 2 – Reticulated foam with random voids [Go to Page]
- 6.3.6 Dead zone and proximal and distal working limits
- 6.3.7 Slice thickness
- 6.3.8 Depth of penetration
- 6.3.9 Displayed dynamic range
- 6.3.10 Display error or position recording error
- 6.3.11 Measurement system accuracy
- 6.3.12 M-mode calibration
- 6.3.13 Beam shape
- 6.3.14 Uniformity-degradation (element or channel) test
- Annex A (informative) Test objects and tissue-mimicking material [Go to Page]
- A.1 Test object structures
- A.2 Tissue-mimicking materials
- A.3 Description of test objects [Go to Page]
- A.3.1 Soft tissue-mimicking test object
- A.3.2 Axial resolution test object
- Figure A.1 – Soft tissue-mimicking test object [Go to Page]
- A.3.3 Multi-purpose resolution test object
- Figure A.2 – Axial resolution test object
- Figure A.3 – Multi-purpose resolution test object [Go to Page]
- A.3.4 Contrast test objects
- Figure A.4 – Slice-thickness measurement and calculation [Go to Page]
- A.3.5 Low-scattering sphere void test object
- Figure A.5 – Contrast test object [Go to Page]
- A.3.6 Randomly positioned, embedded low-echo spheres phantom
- Figure A.6 – Non-scattering spheres test object [Go to Page]
- A.3.7 Cylindrical-void phantom
- Figure A.7 – End view of the phantom applicable for 2 MHz to 7 MHz showing the spatially random distribution of 4-mm diameter spheres [Go to Page]
- A.3.8 Edinburgh pipe phantom
- Figure A.8 – Essential components of Satrapa's cylindical-void phantom
- Figure A.9 – Structures of foams
- Figure A.10 – Schematic of Edinburgh pipe phantom showing anechoic pipes within the tissue mimicking material [Go to Page]
- A.3.9 Crossed-threads phantom
- Figure A.11 – Image from a preclinical ultrasound scanner operating at 55 MHz showing the length over which a 92-micron pipe can be visualised in the scan plane
- Figure A.12 – 3D-thread phantom
- Figure A.13 – Beam profiles calculated from the single-filament images
- Figure A.14 – Thread groups with threads stretched at 45º angles to each other
- Figure A.15 – (above) Azimuthal and elevational beam profiles obtained from a filament phantom; (below) Constant depth (C-images) from a random-void phantom
- Figure A.16 – Beam profiles calculated for a matrix probe
- Annex B (informative) Test procedures [Go to Page]
- B.1 Analysis of random-void phantoms [Go to Page]
- B.1.1 Automated segmentation and sorting of voids
- B.1.2 Procedure for detecting voids and assigning contrast-scaled spherical objects to them for display of the best imaging zones
- Figure B.1 – Segmentation of voids performed following void contrast (void signal amplitude) ranking and transfer in small spheres like a “container” to the corresponding contrast fraction
- Figure B.2 – WCR-plot for 10 fractions with the reference level set to 70
- Figure B.3 – Screen shots of rotating volume images of a random-void phantom using gray-scale (left) and VDRi-levels (right) in transparent mode
- B.2 Analysis of beam profiles using cross-threads phantoms [Go to Page]
- B.2.1 Test procedure for crossed-threads phantom
- B.2.2 Analysis of display sonic contrast when using a foam phantom
- Figure B.4 – Screen shot of a rotating-volume image of random-void phantom after automatic segmentation
- Figure B.5 – Determination of display sonic contrast (symbolic)
- Figure B.6 – Result of 3D-display sonic contrast determination (example)
- Figure B.7 – A Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) chart, giving only "signal“ without "noise“, expressed in dB
- Bibliography [Go to Page]
