Already a subscriber?
MADCAD.com Free Trial
Sign up for a 3 day free trial to explore the MADCAD.com interface, PLUS access the
2009 International Building Code to see how it all works.
If you like to setup a quick demo, let us know at support@madcad.com
or +1 800.798.9296 and we will be happy to schedule a webinar for you.
Security check
Please login to your personal account to use this feature.
Please login to your authorized staff account to use this feature.
Are you sure you want to empty the cart?
PD IEC TS 62882:2020 Hydraulic machines. Francis turbine pressure fluctuation transposition, 2020
- undefined
- CONTENTS
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms, definitions, symbols and units [Go to Page]
- 3.1 General terms and definitions
- 3.2 Units
- 3.3 Overview of the terms, definitions, symbols and units used in this document [Go to Page]
- 3.3.1 Subscripts and symbols
- 3.3.2 Geometric terms and definitions
- Figure 1 – Reference diameter of Francis turbine [Go to Page]
- 3.3.3 Physical quantities and properties terms and definitions
- 3.3.4 Discharge, velocity and speed terms and definitions
- Figures [Go to Page]
- [Go to Page]
- 3.3.5 Pressure terms and definitions
- 3.3.6 Specific energy terms and definitions
- 3.3.7 Height and head terms and definitions
- Figure 2 – Reference level of the Francis turbine [Go to Page]
- 3.3.8 Power and torque terms and definitions
- Figure 3 – Flux diagram for power and discharge [Go to Page]
- 3.3.9 Efficiency terms and definitions
- 3.3.10 General terms and definitions relating to fluctuating quantities
- Figure 4 – Illustration of some definitions related to fluctuating quantities [Go to Page]
- 3.3.11 Fluid dynamic and scaling terms and definitions
- 3.3.12 Dimensionless terms and definitions
- 4 Description of pressure fluctuation phenomena [Go to Page]
- 4.1 General
- Tables [Go to Page]
- Table 1 – Pressure fluctuation overview matrix
- 4.2 Pressure fluctuations overview
- Figure 5 – Discharge range for the various fluctuation modes
- Figure 6 – Efficiency hill chart with pictures of swirling flow
- 4.3 General description of draft tube flow in Francis turbines
- Figure 7 – Example of a waterfall diagram of pressure amplitudes measured in the draft tube cone
- Figure 8 – Velocity triangles at inlet and outlet of the runner blade
- 4.4 Detailed description of pressure fluctuation phenomena [Go to Page]
- 4.4.1 Mode 1: Pressure fluctuation in high load
- Figure 9 – Influence of the discharge on the circumferential component of the absolute velocity [Go to Page]
- 4.4.2 Mode 2: Pressure fluctuation in best operation range
- 4.4.3 Mode 3: Pressure fluctuation in upper part load
- 4.4.4 Mode 4: Pressure fluctuation in part load
- Figure 10 – Elliptical vortex rope precessing in the draft tube cone at upper part load
- Figure 11 – Decomposition between the synchronous and asynchronous component of part load draft tube pressure fluctuations [Go to Page]
- 4.4.5 Mode 5: Pressure fluctuation in deep part load
- Figure 12 – Example of inter-blade vortex [Go to Page]
- 4.4.6 Modes 6.a and 6.b: Rotor-stator interaction (RSI) pressure fluctuation
- Figure 13 – Modulation process between runner blade flow field and guide vanes flow field
- Figure 14 – Diametrical modes shapes representation according to k values
- 5 Specifications of pressure fluctuation measurement and analysis [Go to Page]
- 5.1 General [Go to Page]
- 5.1.1 Overview
- 5.1.2 Purpose of the measurements
- 5.1.3 Procedures and parameters to record
- 5.1.4 Locations of pressure fluctuation test transducers
- Figure 15 – Suggested locations of pressure transducers [Go to Page]
- 5.1.5 Data acquisition for pressure fluctuation measurements
- Table 2 – Locations of pressure fluctuations transducers [Go to Page]
- 5.1.6 Transducers and calibration
- 5.2 Pressure fluctuation on a model turbine [Go to Page]
- 5.2.1 General
- Figure 16 – Turbine hill-chart with exploration paths [Go to Page]
- 5.2.2 Homology and limitations
- 5.2.3 Detailed procedures
- Figure 17 – Schematic of the axial aeration device
- 5.3 Special requirements and information for a prototype turbine [Go to Page]
- 5.3.1 General
- 5.3.2 Source of information
- 5.3.3 Important aspects
- 5.4 Analysis, presentation and interpretation of results [Go to Page]
- 5.4.1 General
- 5.4.2 Time-domain analysis
- Figure 18 – Schematic arrangement for pressure fluctuation transducers [Go to Page]
- 5.4.3 Frequency-domain analysis
- 5.4.4 Non-dimensional frequency and pressure
- 5.4.5 Presentation and interpretation of pressure fluctuations
- 6 Identification of potential resonances in test rig and prototype [Go to Page]
- 6.1 General
- Figure 19 – Typical plot showing pressure fluctuation coefficient versus relative discharge
- Figure 20 – Elementary hydroacoustic oscillator
- 6.2 Identify resonance in test rig
- 6.3 Possible resonance and self-excited pressure fluctuation in prototype [Go to Page]
- 6.3.1 General
- 6.3.2 Draft tube vortex related resonances and self-excited pressure fluctuation in prototype
- Figure 21 – Part load vortex rope in the draft tube and its fluctuation frequency range and corresponding risk of resonance with the generator local mode of oscillation valid for both Fgrid = 50 Hz and Fgrid = 60 Hz [Go to Page]
- 6.3.3 Rotor-stator interaction (RSI) related resonance
- 6.3.4 Resonance with fluctuation modes not treated in this document
- 7 Transposition method and procedure [Go to Page]
- 7.1 General
- 7.2 Parameters influencing transposition [Go to Page]
- 7.2.1 Model test head
- 7.2.2 Thoma number
- 7.2.3 Froude number
- 7.3 Relevant quantities for transposition [Go to Page]
- 7.3.1 Fluctuation frequency
- 7.3.2 Fluctuation amplitude
- 7.4 Transposable types of fluctuations
- Figure 22 – Waterfall diagram of the pressure fluctuations as function of the frequency and Froude number for a given Thoma number
- 7.5 Statistical analysis of model and prototype transposition accuracy
- Table 3 – Accuracy for transposition of fluctuation amplitude in draft tube cone
- Table 4 – Accuracy for transposition of fluctuation amplitude in vaneless zone
- 8 Mitigations [Go to Page]
- 8.1 Draft tube vortex phenomena [Go to Page]
- 8.1.1 General
- 8.1.2 Draft tube fins
- Table 5 – Accuracy for transposition of fluctuation amplitude in spiral case [Go to Page]
- 8.1.3 Draft tube with a central column
- Figure 23 – Example of fins in the draft tube and influence on the pressure fluctuations [Go to Page]
- 8.1.4 Air admission
- Figure 24 – Example of the draft tube with central column extension
- Figure 25 – Typical runner cone extensions used for reducing draft tube pressure fluctuations [Go to Page]
- 8.1.5 AVR or PSS parameter tuning
- Figure 26 – Central and peripheral air admission locations for draft tube pressure fluctuations on a radial flow turbine
- Figure 27 – Central air admission
- 8.2 Runner inter-blade vortex
- 8.3 Blade interaction
- 8.4 Operation restriction
- Annexes [Go to Page]
- Annex A (informative) Example of pressure fluctuation records
- Figure A.1 – Example 1: a case corresponding to mode 1 (a limited high load)
- Figure A.2 – Example 2: a case corresponding to mode 1 (a large overload)
- Figure A.3 – Example 3: a case corresponding to mode 2
- Figure A.4 – Example 4 : a case corresponding to mode 3
- Figure A.5 – Example 5 : a case corresponding to mode 4.a and 4.b
- Figure A.6 – Example 6: a case corresponding to mode 4.a and 4.b
- Figure A.7 – Example 7: a case corresponding to mode 4.c
- Figure A.8 – Example 8: a case corresponding to mode 5.b
- Figure A.9 – Example 9: a case corresponding to mode 6.a
- Annex B (informative) Typical pressure fluctuation transducers parameters for model test
- Annex C (informative) Pressure transducer dynamic calibration [Go to Page]
- C.1 Fast valve opening method
- C.2 Rotating valve method
- Figure C.1 – Pressure transducer dynamic calibration schematic diagram with fast open valve method [Go to Page]
- C.3 Electrical spark method
- Figure C.2 – Pressure transducer dynamic calibration with rotating valve method
- Figure C.3 – Spark plug used as to generate an impulse excitation in water for pressure transducer dynamic calibration
- Annex D (informative) Proposed remote pressure measurement fluctuation correction [Go to Page]
- D.1 General
- D.2 Correction method theory
- D.3 Measuring and estimating tube frequency response
- Figure D.1 – Typical results obtained by shutting off drainage valve
- Table D.1 –and calculated for p1 to p4 [Go to Page]
- D.4 Pressure fluctuation correction
- Table D.2 – Estimated frequencies based on tubing mechanical characteristics
- Figure D.2 – Signal and spectrum of four remote sensors and one local sensor
- Table D.3 – Peak-to-peak value on the raw signals
- Table D.4 – Wave speed and damping ratio
- Figure D.3 – Signal and spectrum of four remote sensors (corrected) and one local sensor [Go to Page]
- D.5 Limitations
- Table D.5 – Peak-to-peak value on the corrected signals
- Annex E (informative) Forced response analysis for Francis turbines operating in part load conditions [Go to Page]
- E.1 General
- E.2 Systematic methodology based on detailed modelling of hydroelectric power plant [Go to Page]
- E.2.1 Description of the test case
- E.2.2 Modelling of the hydraulic power plant
- Figure E.1 – SIMSEN model of the test case
- Figure E.2 – Performance hill chart of the Francis turbine for different guide vane openings
- Table E.1 – Francis turbine parameters
- Figure E.3 – Elementary hydraulic pipe of length dx and its equivalent circuit [Go to Page]
- [Go to Page]
- E.2.3 Forced response analysis of the test case
- Figure E.4 – Forced response for a = 50 m/s (left) and a = 60 m/s (right)
- Figure E.5 – Forced response for a = 70 m/s (left) and a = 80 m/s (right)
- Figure E.6 – Forced response for a = 90 m/s (left) and a = 100 m/s (right)
- Figure E.7 – Damping and eigenfrequency for a = 50 m/s (left) and a = 60 m/s (right)
- Figure E.8 – Damping and eigenfrequency for a = 70 m/s (left) and a = 80 m/s (right)
- Figure E.9 – Damping and eigenfrequency for a = 90 m/s (left) and a = 100 m/s (right)
- Figure E.10 – Eigenmode for a = 50 m/s and eigenfrequency f = 4,18 Hz
- Figure E.11 – Eigenmode for a = 50 m/s and eigenfrequency f = 3,67 Hz
- Figure E.12 – Eigenmode for a = 100 m/s and eigenfrequency f = 2,61 Hz [Go to Page]
- E.3 Simplified approach based on the hydroacoustic properties of the hydraulic system [Go to Page]
- E.3.1 General
- E.3.2 Cavitating draft tube first natural frequency
- Figure E.13 – Draft tube modelled with cavitation compliance and draft tube inductance [Go to Page]
- [Go to Page]
- E.3.3 Hydraulic circuit natural frequencies
- Figure E.14 – Simplified model of a cavitation draft tube connected to a tailrace pipe composed by cavitation compliance of the draft tube and downstream inductance of the tailrace pipe [Go to Page]
- [Go to Page]
- E.3.4 Example of applications
- Figure E.15 – Hydraulic system modelled by an equivalent pipe and corresponding modes shapes for the first and second natural frequencies
- Figure E.16 – Hydraulic systems 1, 2 and 3
- Table E.2 – Parameters of the hydraulic systems 1, 2 and 3
- Table E.3 – Parameters of the equivalent pipe of the hydraulic system 1
- Table E.4 – Estimation of the natural frequencies f0 to f6 of the hydraulic system 1 based on Formulae (E.9) and (E.11) and comparison with results obtained with eigenvalue calculation and corresponding errors
- Table E.5 – Parameters of the equivalent pipe of the hydraulic system 2
- Table E.6 – Estimation of the natural frequencies f0 to f6 of the hydraulic system 2 based on Formulae (E.10) and (E.11) and comparison with results obtained with eigenvalue calculation and corresponding errors
- Table E.7 – Parameters of the equivalent pipe of the hydraulic system 3 [Go to Page]
- [Go to Page]
- E.3.5 Limitations of the methodology
- Table E.8 – Estimation of the natural frequencies f0 to f6 of the hydraulic system 3 based on Formulae (E.10) and (E.11) and comparison with results obtained with eigenvalue calculation and corresponding errors
- Table E.9 – Pressure mode shape obtained by eigenvalue and eigenvector calculation for the three first natural frequencies f1, f2 and f3 of the hydraulic systems 1 and 2
- Annex F (informative) Influence of Thoma number on pressure fluctuation
- Figure F.1 – Influence of Thoma number on pressure fluctuation
- Figure F.2 – Example of waterfall diagram of the pressure fluctuations as function of the frequency and Thoma number
- Annex G (informative) Transposition of synchronous pressure fluctuations from model to prototype for Francis turbines operating at off-design conditions [Go to Page]
- G.1 General [Go to Page]
- G.1.1 Overview
- Figure G.1 – Peak-to-peak value of pressure fluctuations as a function of the discharge factor measured on the model and the corresponding prototype
- Figure G.2 – Layout of EPFL test rig PF3 1-D hydroacoustic model
- Figure G.3 – Electrical T-shaped representation of the cavitation vortex rope developing in Francis turbine draft tube in part load conditions
- Figure G.4 – Excitation system and 3D cut-view of the rotating valve
- Figure G.5 – Strouhal number of the precession frequency as a function of the swirl number computed with Formula (G.6)
- Figure G.6 – Strouhal number of the first eigen frequency of the test rig as a function of swirl number (a), the wave speed in the draft tube determined in the 1-D model (b)
- Figure G.7 – Predicted values of precession frequency and first eigenfrequency at the prototype scale as a function of the output power of the generating unit
- Figure G.8 – Comparison between observed and predicted values of the precession frequency frope and the first eigenfrequency f0 of a 444 MW hydropower unit (HYPERBOLE project test case)
- Figure G.9 – Hill chart comparing the measured and the predicted resonance conditions assuming a constant pressure value in the draft tube cone of the prototype
- Annex H (informative) Statistical analysis of pressure fluctuation data [Go to Page]
- H.1 Normalizing step for the comparison of data
- Figure H.1 – Pressure fluctuations versus discharge factor
- Figure H.2 – Normalized discharge of pressure fluctuations
- Figure H.3 – Normalized pressure amplitude of pressure fluctuations
- Figure H.4 – Comparison of pressure fluctuations of model and prototype [Go to Page]
- H.2 Collected data
- H.3 Draft tube zone phenomena
- Figure H.5 – Set of pressure fluctuation of models and prototypes for draft tube analysis
- Table H.1 – World hydropower plant references
- Figure H.6 – Difference between pressure fluctuations between the model and the prototype
- Figure H.7 – Standard deviation of difference of pressure fluctuation
- Figure H.8 – Transposition accuracy for draft tube cone [Go to Page]
- H.4 Vaneless zone phenomena
- Figure H.9 – Transposition of each power plant test case for the draft tube cone
- Figure H.10 – Set of pressure fluctuation of models and prototypes for vaneless zone analysis
- Figure H.11 – Difference between pressure fluctuations between the model and the prototype
- Figure H.12 – Standard deviation of difference of pressure fluctuation
- Figure H.13 – Transposition accuracy for vaneless zone
- Figure H.14 – Transposition of each power plant test case for vaneless zone [Go to Page]
- H.5 Spiral case phenomena
- Figure H.15 – Set of pressure fluctuation of models and prototypes for spiral case analysis
- Figure H.16 – Difference between pressure fluctuations between the model and the prototype
- Figure H.17 – Standard deviation of difference of pressure fluctuation
- Figure H.18 – Transposition accuracy for spiral case
- Figure H.19 – Transposition of each power plant test cases for spiral case
- Annex J (informative) Gathering worldwide pressure fluctuation data [Go to Page]
- J.1 Chinese test cases
- J.2 France test case
- Figure J.1 – Comparison of pressure fluctuations on the draft tube for 10 Chinese model and prototype references
- Figure J.2 – Comparison of pressure fluctuations on the draft tube for one France model and prototype reference
- Figure J.3 – Comparison of pressure fluctuations on the spiral case for one France model and prototype reference [Go to Page]
- J.3 Norway test case
- Figure J.4 – Comparison of pressure fluctuations on the draft tube for one Norway model and prototype reference
- Bibliography [Go to Page]