FORMAT
BOOKS
PACKAGES
EDITION
PUBLISHER
CONTENT TYPE
Act
Admin Code
Announcements
Bill
Book
CADD File
CAN
CEU
Charter
Checklist
City Code
Code
Commentary
Comprehensive Plan
Conference Paper
County Code
Course
DHS Documents
Document
Errata
Executive Regulation
Federal Guideline
Firm Content
Guideline
Handbook
Interpretation
Journal
Land Use and Development
Law
Legislative Rule
Local Amendment
Local Code
Local Document
Local Regulation
Local Standards
Manual
Model Code
Model Standard
Notice
Ordinance
Other
Paperback
PASS
Periodicals
PIN
Plan
Policy
Product
Product - Data Sheet
Program
Provisions
Requirements
Revisions
Rules & Regulations
Standards
State Amendment
State Code
State Manual
State Plan
State Standards
Statute
Study Guide
Supplement
Sustainability
Technical Bulletin
All
|
Description of ASTM-D3244 2012ASTM D3244 - 12Standard Practice for Utilization of Test Data to Determine Conformance with SpecificationsActive Standard ASTM D3244 | Developed by Subcommittee: D02.94 Book of Standards Volume: 05.01 ASTM D3244Significance and Use 4.1 This practice provides a means whereby the parties to a transaction can resolve potential quality disputes over those product properties which can be tested and expressed numerically. 4.1.1 This practice can be used to ensure that such properties are correctly stated on labels or in other descriptions of the product. 4.1.2 This practice can be implemented in those cases where a supplier uses an in-house or a commercial testing laboratory to sample and test a product prior to releasing the product to a shipper (intermediate receiver) and the ultimate receiver also uses an in-house or commercial testing laboratory to sample and test the product upon arrival at the destination. The ATV would still be determined according to 8.3 . 4.2 This practice can assist in the determination of tolerances from specification limits which will ensure that the true value of a property is sufficiently close to the specification value with a mutually agreed probability so that the product is acceptable to the receiver. Such tolerances are bounded by an acceptance limit (AL) . If the ATV value determined by applying this practice falls on the AL or on the acceptable side of the AL , the product can be accepted; otherwise it shall be deemed to have failed the product acceptance requirement established by applying this practice. 4.3 Application of this practice requires the AL be determined prior to actual commencement of testing. Therefore, the degree of criticality of the specification, as determined by the Probability of Acceptance (P value) that is required to calculate the AL , shall have been mutually agreed upon between both parties prior to execution of actual product testing. 4.3.1 This agreement should include a decision as to whether the ATV is to be determined by the absolute or rounding-off method of Practice E29 , as therein defined. 4.3.1.1 If the rounding-off method is to be used, the number of significant digits to be retained must also be agreed upon. 4.3.1.2 These decisions must also be made in the case where only one party is involved, as in the case of a label. 4.3.1.3 In the absence of such an agreement, this practice recommends the ATV be rounded in accordance with the rounding-off method in Practice E29 to the number of significant digits that are specified in the governing specification. 4.4 This practice is designed to be suitable for reference in contracts governing the transfer of petroleum products and lubricants from a supplier to a receiver. 4.5 As a prerequisite for acceptance for lab test results to be used in this practice, the following conditions shall be satisfied: 4.5.1 Site precision (R ? ) as defined in Practice D6299 for the appropriate test method(s) from each lab, as substantiated by in-house quality control programs, for property typical of the product in dispute, should have a TPI > 1.2 (see Practice D6792 for TPI explanation), but at a minimum shall be better than the published method reproducibility (R). 4.5.2 Each lab shall be able to demonstrate, by way of results from interlaboratory exchange programs, a lack of a systemic bias relative to exchange averages for the appropriate test method(s) as per methodology outlined in Guide D7372 . 4.5.3 In the event that the site precision of laboratories from two parties are statistically different as confirmed by the F-test (see Annex A4 ), then, for the purpose of establishing the ATV , each laboratory's test result shall be inversely weighted in accordance with laboratory's demonstrated variance. 4.6 It is recommended that this practice be conducted under the guidance of a qualified statistician. 1. Scope 1.1 This practice covers guidelines and statistical methodologies with which two parties, usually a supplier and a receiver, can compare and combine independently obtained test results to obtain an Assigned Test Value ( ATV ) for the purpose of resolving a product quality dispute. 1.2 This practice defines a technique for comparing an ATV with a specification limit. 1.3 This practice applies only to those test methods which specifically state that the repeatability and reproducibility values conform to the definitions herein. 1.4 The statistical principles and methodology outlined in this practice can also be used to obtain an ATV for specification conformance decision when multiple results are obtained for the same batch of product within a single laboratory. For this application, site precision (R') as defined in Practice D6299 shall be used in lieu of test method published reproducibility (R).
ASTM Standards D1319 Test Method for Hydrocarbon Types in Liquid Petroleum Products by Fluorescent Indicator Adsorption D4057 Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products D4177 Practice for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products D6300 Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias Data for Use in Test Methods for Petroleum Products and Lubricants E29 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to Determine Conformance with Specifications ISO Standard ISO4259 Determination and Application of Precision Data in Relation to Methods of TestKeywords acceptance; acceptance limits; agreement; conformance; dispute; precision; rejection; specifications; ICS Code ICS Number Code 75.100 (Lubricants, industrial oils and related products) DOI: 10.1520/D3244-12 ASTM International is a member of CrossRef. ASTM D3244The following editions for this book are also available...
This book also exists in the following packages...Subscription InformationMADCAD.com ASTM Standards subscriptions are annual and access is unlimited concurrency based (number of people that can access the subscription at any given time) from single office location. For pricing on multiple office location ASTM Standards Subscriptions, please contact us at info@madcad.com or +1 800.798.9296.
Some features of MADCAD.com ASTM Standards Subscriptions are: - Immediate Access: As soon as the transaction is completed, your ASTM Standards Subscription will be ready for access.
For any further information on MADCAD.com ASTM Standards Subscriptions, please contact us at info@madcad.com or +1 800.798.9296.
About ASTMASTM International, formerly known as the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), is a globally recognized leader in the development and delivery of international voluntary consensus standards. Today, some 12,000 ASTM standards are used around the world to improve product quality, enhance safety, facilitate market access and trade, and build consumer confidence. ASTM’s leadership in international standards development is driven by the contributions of its members: more than 30,000 of the world’s top technical experts and business professionals representing 150 countries. Working in an open and transparent process and using ASTM’s advanced electronic infrastructure, ASTM members deliver the test methods, specifications, guides, and practices that support industries and governments worldwide. |
GROUPS
|