Cart (0)
  • No items in cart.
Total
$0
There is a technical issue about last added item. You can click "Report to us" button to let us know and we resolve the issue and return back to you or you can continue without last item via click to continue button.
Search book title
Filters:
FORMAT
BOOKS
PACKAGES
EDITION
to
PUBLISHER
(1)
(337)
(589)
(54)
(234)
(996)
(657)
(2161)
(117)
(94394)
(54)
(568)
(124)
(33)
(21)
(20)
(94534)
(3)
(17)
(1)
(374)
(315)
(6731)
(241)
(16)
(6)
(1646)
(17)
(19)
(28)
(4)
 
(6)
(7)
(115)
(3)
(57)
(5)
(5)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(25)
(27)
(27)
(13)
(61)
(24)
(22)
(7)
(8)
(20)
(1)
(3)
(50)
(6)
(31)
CONTENT TYPE
 Act
 Admin Code
 Announcements
 Bill
 Book
 CADD File
 CAN
 CEU
 Charter
 Checklist
 City Code
 Code
 Commentary
 Comprehensive Plan
 Conference Paper
 County Code
 Course
 DHS Documents
 Document
 Errata
 Executive Regulation
 Federal Guideline
 Firm Content
 Guideline
 Handbook
 Interpretation
 Journal
 Land Use and Development
 Law
 Legislative Rule
 Local Amendment
 Local Code
 Local Document
 Local Regulation
 Local Standards
 Manual
 Model Code
 Model Standard
 Notice
 Ordinance
 Other
 Paperback
 PASS
 Periodicals
 PIN
 Plan
 Policy
 Product
 Product - Data Sheet
 Program
 Provisions
 Requirements
 Revisions
 Rules & Regulations
 Standards
 State Amendment
 State Code
 State Manual
 State Plan
 State Standards
 Statute
 Study Guide
 Supplement
 Sustainability
 Technical Bulletin
 All
  • BSI
    BS ISO 8588:2017 Sensory analysis. Methodology. \"A\". \"not A\" test
    Edition: 2017
    $313.97
    / user per year

Description of BS ISO 8588:2017 2017

This document specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference exists between samples of two products. The method applies whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several.

The “A” – “not A” test can be used in sensory analysis in the following ways:

  1. as a difference test, particularly for evaluating samples having variations, for example, in appearance (making it difficult to obtain strictly identical repeat samples) or in aftertaste (making direct comparison difficult);

  2. as a recognition test, particularly for determining whether an assessor or group of assessors identifies a new stimulus in relation to a known stimulus (for example, recognition of the quality of the sweet taste of a new sweetener);

  3. as a perception test, to determine the ability of an assessor to discriminate stimuli.

The “A” – “not A” test is not appropriate for assessing if two products are sufficiently similar to be used interchangeably (i.e. for similarity testing) because the “A” – “not A” test inherently involves replicate evaluations of the same products by all assessors. These replicate evaluations violate the basic assumptions for similarity tests to be statistically valid.

Examples of its application are given in Annex B.

NOTE Bi and Ennis[1] point out that the estimate of the discriminal distance, d’, between the “A” and “not A” samples is the same regardless of the nature of the replicated evaluations performed in the test but that the estimate of the variance of d’ does depend on how the replicate evaluations were performed. As such, no general discussion of a Thurstonian analysis of the “A” – “not A” method, nor of the power of the test is undertaken in this document. Interested readers are referred to Reference [1] for a detailed discussion of the topic.



About BSI

BSI Group, also known as the British Standards Institution is the national standards body of the United Kingdom. BSI produces technical standards on a wide range of products and services and also supplies certification and standards-related services to businesses.

X